Side-by-side comparison

Beef Chuck Roast Cooked vs Graham Crackers

Graham Crackers wins by 19 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Beef Chuck Roast Cooked scores 59/100, Graham Crackers scores 78/100. Graham Crackers wins by 19 points on saturated fat (0g vs 3.8g per 100 g) and fiber (5.7g vs 0g per 100 g).

0/ 100

meat

Beef Chuck Roast Cooked

Decent · 100 g

0/ 100

meat

Graham Crackers

Very good · 100 g

Per 100gBeef Chuck Roast CookedGraham Crackers

Calories190 kcal386 kcal

Protein26.41 g5.71 g

Fiber0 g5.7 g

Total fat9.36 g5.71 g

Saturated fat3.75 g0 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium79 mg629 mg

Potassium339 mg171 mg

Calcium18 mg429 mg

Iron2.52 mg3.09 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.