Side-by-side comparison

Beef Chuck Roast Cooked vs Ham Sliced

Ham Sliced wins by 22 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Beef Chuck Roast Cooked scores 59/100, Ham Sliced scores 81/100. Ham Sliced wins by 22 points on saturated fat (0.5g vs 3.8g per 100 g) and fiber (1.3g vs 0g per 100 g).

0/ 100

meat

Beef Chuck Roast Cooked

Decent · 100 g

0/ 100

meat

Ham Sliced

Very good · 100 g

Per 100gBeef Chuck Roast CookedHam Sliced

Calories190 kcal164 kcal

Protein26.41 g16.6 g

Fiber0 g1.3 g

Total fat9.36 g8.8 g

Saturated fat3.75 g0.5 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium79 mg814 mg

Potassium339 mg287 mg

Calcium18 mg24 mg

Iron2.52 mg1.02 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.