Side-by-side comparison

GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT vs ARKONA MACKEREL FILLET

ARKONA MACKEREL FILLET wins by 23 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

other

GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT

Decent · 3 tenders

0/ 100

other

ARKONA MACKEREL FILLET

Good · 0.25 cup

Per 100gGARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOTARKONA MACKEREL FILLET

Calories250 kcal145.09 kcal

Protein14.29 g20 g

Fiber1.2 g0 g

Total fat11.9 g5.45 g

Saturated fat1.19 g1.82 g

Added sugar1.2 g0 g

Sodium642.86 mg363.64 mg

Potassium166.67 mg0 mg

Calcium35.95 mg363.64 mg

Iron4.76 mg2.62 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.