FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT vs Mahi Mahi Cooked

Mahi Mahi Cooked wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100
other
GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT
Decent · 3 tenders
0/ 100
other
Mahi Mahi Cooked
Good · 100 g
Per 100gGARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOTMahi Mahi Cooked
Calories250 kcal0 kcal
Protein14.29 g19.79 g
Fiber1.2 g0 g
Total fat11.9 g0.38 g
Saturated fat1.19 g0 g
Added sugar1.2 g0 g
Sodium642.86 mg51.93 mg
Potassium166.67 mg407.9 mg
Calcium35.95 mg6 mg
Iron4.76 mg0.05 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.