Side-by-side comparison

Ham Sliced vs Chicken breast (skinless, cooked)

Ham Sliced wins by 7 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Ham Sliced scores 81/100, Chicken breast (skinless, cooked) scores 74/100. Ham Sliced wins by 7 points on saturated fat (0.5g vs 1g per 100 g) and fiber (1.3g vs 0g per 100 g).

0/ 100

meat

Ham Sliced

Very good · 100 g

0/ 100

meat

Chicken breast (skinless, cooked)

Good · 3 oz

Per 100gHam SlicedChicken breast (skinless, cooked)

Calories164 kcal165 kcal

Protein16.6 g31 g

Fiber1.3 g0 g

Total fat8.8 g3.6 g

Saturated fat0.5 g1 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium814 mg74 mg

Potassium287 mg256 mg

Calcium24 mg15 mg

Iron1.02 mg1 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.