Side-by-side comparison

Lean Cuisine Chicken Fettuccini vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Lean Cuisine Chicken Fettuccini scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 3.9g per 100 g) and protein (21.4g vs 7.1g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

Lean Cuisine Chicken Fettuccini

Decent · 1 Package (311g)

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gLean Cuisine Chicken FettucciniBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories125.08 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein7.07 g21.43 g

Fiber1 g0 g

Total fat1.61 g1.53 g

Saturated fat0.48 g0.51 g

Added sugar3.9 g0 g

Sodium251.13 mg438.78 mg

Potassium161.09 mg142.86 mg

Calcium22.99 mg0 mg

Iron0.71 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.