Side-by-side comparison

Munchos Hot 7z vs BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Munchos Hot 7z scores 37/100, BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE scores 61/100. BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0.7g vs 5.4g per 100 g) and sodium (724mg vs 750mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

Munchos Hot 7z

Poor · None

0/ 100

snack

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

Good · 4 BITES

Per 100gMunchos Hot 7zBOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

Calories571.43 kcal197.37 kcal

Protein3.57 g7.89 g

Fiber3.61 g9.2 g

Total fat35.71 g7.89 g

Saturated fat5.36 g0.66 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium750 mg723.68 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg78.95 mg

Iron0 mg2.37 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.