Side-by-side comparison

NABISCO RITZ CRACKERS WHOLE WHEAT SANDWICH AND WHITE CHEDDAR 1X10.800 OZ vs BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: NABISCO RITZ CRACKERS WHOLE WHEAT SANDWICH AND WHITE CHEDDAR 1X10.800 OZ scores 37/100, BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE scores 61/100. BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0.7g vs 7.9g per 100 g) and sodium (724mg vs 895mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

NABISCO RITZ CRACKERS WHOLE WHEAT SANDWICH AND WHITE CHEDDAR 1X10.800 OZ

Poor · None

0/ 100

snack

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

Good · 4 BITES

Per 100gNABISCO RITZ CRACKERS WHOLE WHEAT SANDWICH AND WHITE CHEDDAR 1X10.800 OZBOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

Calories473.68 kcal197.37 kcal

Protein7.89 g7.89 g

Fiber5.29 g9.2 g

Total fat23.71 g7.89 g

Saturated fat7.89 g0.66 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium894.74 mg723.68 mg

Potassium276.32 mg0 mg

Calcium193.95 mg78.95 mg

Iron3.11 mg2.37 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.