Side-by-side comparison

Pork Tenderloin Cooked vs Ham Sliced

Ham Sliced wins by 23 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Pork Tenderloin Cooked scores 58/100, Ham Sliced scores 81/100. Ham Sliced wins by 23 points on saturated fat (0.5g vs 1.2g per 100 g) and fiber (1.3g vs 0g per 100 g).

0/ 100

meat

Pork Tenderloin Cooked

Decent · 100 g

0/ 100

meat

Ham Sliced

Very good · 100 g

Per 100gPork Tenderloin CookedHam Sliced

Calories143 kcal164 kcal

Protein26.17 g16.6 g

Fiber0 g1.3 g

Total fat3.51 g8.8 g

Saturated fat1.2 g0.5 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium57 mg814 mg

Potassium421 mg287 mg

Calcium6 mg24 mg

Iron1.15 mg1.02 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.