Side-by-side comparison

SMITHFIELD 97% FAT FREE COOKED HAM WATER ADDED vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER

BLUE HARBOR FISH . WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SMITHFIELD 97% FAT FREE COOKED HAM WATER ADDED scores 44/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER scores 68/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 2.5g per 100 g) and sodium (179mg vs 1111mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

SMITHFIELD 97% FAT FREE COOKED HAM WATER ADDED

Poor · 1 SLICE

0/ 100

beverage

BLUE HARBOR FISH . WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER

Good · 2 ONZ

Per 100gSMITHFIELD 97% FAT FREE COOKED HAM WATER ADDEDBLUE HARBOR FISH . WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER

Calories107.14 kcal125 kcal

Protein17.89 g26.79 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat3.57 g1.79 g

Saturated fat0 g0.89 g

Added sugar2.5 g0 g

Sodium1110.71 mg178.57 mg

Potassium0 mg321.43 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron1.29 mg1.29 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.