Side-by-side comparison

AMY'S Thai Red Curry Bowl vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: AMY'S Thai Red Curry Bowl scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 1.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0.5g vs 3.2g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

AMY'S Thai Red Curry Bowl

Decent · 1 tray

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gAMY'S Thai Red Curry BowlBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories140.99 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein3.18 g21.43 g

Fiber1.1 g0 g

Total fat7.07 g1.53 g

Saturated fat3.18 g0.51 g

Added sugar1.8 g0 g

Sodium292.93 mg438.78 mg

Potassium144.88 mg142.86 mg

Calcium20.99 mg0 mg

Iron0.78 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.