Side-by-side comparison

BACK TO NATURE, RAINFOREST ALLIANCE CERTIFIED, COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHUNK, CHOCOLATE CHUNK vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 66 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BACK TO NATURE, RAINFOREST ALLIANCE CERTIFIED, COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHUNK, CHOCOLATE CHUNK scores 16/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 66 points on added sugar (0g vs 24.2g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 5.8g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

BACK TO NATURE, RAINFOREST ALLIANCE CERTIFIED, COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHUNK, CHOCOLATE CHUNK

Avoid · 2 COOKIES

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gBACK TO NATURE, RAINFOREST ALLIANCE CERTIFIED, COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHUNK, CHOCOLATE CHUNKLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories500 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein7.69 g9.8 g

Fiber3.8 g9.8 g

Total fat23.12 g25.49 g

Saturated fat5.77 g4.9 g

Added sugar24.23 g0 g

Sodium268.85 mg0 mg

Potassium135 mg745.1 mg

Calcium0 mg78.04 mg

Iron2.77 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.