Side-by-side comparison

BARKTHINS SNACKING CHOCOLATE DARK CHOCOLATE BLUEBERRY WITH QUINOA CRUNCH vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 80 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BARKTHINS SNACKING CHOCOLATE DARK CHOCOLATE BLUEBERRY WITH QUINOA CRUNCH scores 2/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 80 points on added sugar (0g vs 35g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 12.5g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

BARKTHINS SNACKING CHOCOLATE DARK CHOCOLATE BLUEBERRY WITH QUINOA CRUNCH

Avoid · 1.4 ONZ

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gBARKTHINS SNACKING CHOCOLATE DARK CHOCOLATE BLUEBERRY WITH QUINOA CRUNCHLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories475 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein5 g9.8 g

Fiber2.5 g9.8 g

Total fat20 g25.49 g

Saturated fat12.5 g4.9 g

Added sugar35 g0 g

Sodium75 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium0 mg78.04 mg

Iron4.5 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.