Side-by-side comparison

ECKRICH MESQUITE BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE, MESQUITE BEEF vs POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE

POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE wins by 83 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: ECKRICH MESQUITE BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE, MESQUITE BEEF scores 2/100, POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE scores 85/100. POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE wins by 83 points on added sugar (0g vs 5g per 100 g) and saturated fat (1.8g vs 12.5g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

ECKRICH MESQUITE BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE, MESQUITE BEEF

Avoid · 2 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE

Very good · 2 ONZ

Per 100gECKRICH MESQUITE BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE, MESQUITE BEEFPOLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE

Calories321.43 kcal106.96 kcal

Protein10.7 g17.86 g

Fiber0 g1.8 g

Total fat28.57 g35.71 g

Saturated fat12.5 g1.79 g

Added sugar5 g0 g

Sodium910.71 mg303.57 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg357.14 mg

Iron1.29 mg1.93 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.