Side-by-side comparison

Farmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,PHSE,GM,ET12,12OZ,10#,Z"" vs MW POLAR MACKEREL

MW POLAR MACKEREL wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Farmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,PHSE,GM,ET12,12OZ,10#,Z"" scores 49/100, MW POLAR MACKEREL scores 73/100. MW POLAR MACKEREL wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 0.6g per 100 g) and saturated fat (2.6g vs 3.6g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

Farmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,PHSE,GM,ET12,12OZ,10#,Z""

Decent · 12 OZ

0/ 100

other

MW POLAR MACKEREL

Good · 1/3 cup

Per 100gFarmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,PHSE,GM,ET12,12OZ,10#,Z""MW POLAR MACKEREL

Calories159.82 kcal158.07 kcal

Protein16.07 g22.81 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat10.09 g7.02 g

Saturated fat3.57 g2.63 g

Added sugar0.62 g0 g

Sodium175 mg491.23 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium18.04 mg438.6 mg

Iron0.64 mg2.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.