Side-by-side comparison

Farmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,SM,ET12,6OZ,10#,Z"" vs MW POLAR MACKEREL

MW POLAR MACKEREL wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Farmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,SM,ET12,6OZ,10#,Z"" scores 49/100, MW POLAR MACKEREL scores 73/100. MW POLAR MACKEREL wins by 24 points on saturated fat (2.6g vs 3.8g per 100 g) and protein (22.8g vs 18.3g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

Farmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,SM,ET12,6OZ,10#,Z""

Decent · 3.28 OUNCES

0/ 100

other

MW POLAR MACKEREL

Good · 1/3 cup

Per 100gFarmland ""CHOP,BI,CC,SM,ET12,6OZ,10#,Z""MW POLAR MACKEREL

Calories182.8 kcal158.07 kcal

Protein18.28 g22.81 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat11.83 g7.02 g

Saturated fat3.76 g2.63 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium172.04 mg491.23 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium22.04 mg438.6 mg

Iron0.77 mg2.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.