Side-by-side comparison

GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT vs PACIFIC SEAFOOD COLUMBIA RIVER STEELHEAD PORTIONS

PACIFIC SEAFOOD COLUMBIA RIVER STEELHEAD PORTIONS wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT scores 50/100, PACIFIC SEAFOOD COLUMBIA RIVER STEELHEAD PORTIONS scores 74/100. PACIFIC SEAFOOD COLUMBIA RIVER STEELHEAD PORTIONS wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 1.2g per 100 g) and sodium (31mg vs 643mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

GARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOT

Decent · 3 tenders

0/ 100

other

PACIFIC SEAFOOD COLUMBIA RIVER STEELHEAD PORTIONS

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gGARDEIN NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS, NASHVILLE HOTPACIFIC SEAFOOD COLUMBIA RIVER STEELHEAD PORTIONS

Calories250 kcal256.64 kcal

Protein14.29 g17.7 g

Fiber1.2 g0 g

Total fat11.9 g20.44 g

Saturated fat1.19 g5.31 g

Added sugar1.2 g0 g

Sodium642.86 mg30.97 mg

Potassium166.67 mg328.32 mg

Calcium35.95 mg39.03 mg

Iron4.76 mg0.44 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.