FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

LINDT WHITE CHOCOLATE, WHITE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 81 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: LINDT WHITE CHOCOLATE, WHITE scores 1/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 81 points on added sugar (0g vs 44.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 20.7g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
LINDT WHITE CHOCOLATE, WHITE
Avoid · 7 PIECES
Per 100gLINDT WHITE CHOCOLATE, WHITELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories551.72 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein6.9 g9.8 g
Fiber0 g9.8 g
Total fat34.48 g25.49 g
Saturated fat20.69 g4.9 g
Added sugar44.8 g0 g
Sodium103.1 mg0 mg
Potassium379.31 mg745.1 mg
Calcium275.86 mg78.04 mg
Iron0 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.