FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

M&M'S, CHOCOLATE CANDIES vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: M&M'S, CHOCOLATE CANDIES scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 45.2g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 12.5g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
M&M'S, CHOCOLATE CANDIES
Avoid · 1.69 ONZ
Per 100gM&M'S, CHOCOLATE CANDIESLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories479.17 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein4.17 g9.8 g
Fiber2.1 g9.8 g
Total fat18.75 g25.49 g
Saturated fat12.48 g4.9 g
Added sugar45.21 g0 g
Sodium72.92 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium83.75 mg78.04 mg
Iron0.75 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.