Side-by-side comparison

MANDA AUTHENTIC TURKEY BREAST, SPICY vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: MANDA AUTHENTIC TURKEY BREAST, SPICY scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 1.7g per 100 g) and sodium (439mg vs 976mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

MANDA AUTHENTIC TURKEY BREAST, SPICY

Decent · 3 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gMANDA AUTHENTIC TURKEY BREAST, SPICYBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories82.98 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein15.48 g21.43 g

Fiber1.2 g0 g

Total fat1.19 g1.53 g

Saturated fat0 g0.51 g

Added sugar1.67 g0 g

Sodium976.19 mg438.78 mg

Potassium0 mg142.86 mg

Calcium24.05 mg0 mg

Iron0.43 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.