Side-by-side comparison

PACIFIC, ORGANIC POLENTA, JALAPENO CHEDDAR, JALAPENO CHEDDAR vs CRACOVIA WHITE BEANS WITH MUSHROOMS & TOMATO SAUCE

CRACOVIA WHITE BEANS WITH MUSHROOMS & TOMATO SAUCE wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PACIFIC, ORGANIC POLENTA, JALAPENO CHEDDAR, JALAPENO CHEDDAR scores 41/100, CRACOVIA WHITE BEANS WITH MUSHROOMS & TOMATO SAUCE scores 65/100. CRACOVIA WHITE BEANS WITH MUSHROOMS & TOMATO SAUCE wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0g vs 2.5g per 100 g) and sodium (92mg vs 290mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

PACIFIC, ORGANIC POLENTA, JALAPENO CHEDDAR, JALAPENO CHEDDAR

Poor · 1 "" SLICE

0/ 100

prepared

CRACOVIA WHITE BEANS WITH MUSHROOMS & TOMATO SAUCE

Good · 1 cup

Per 100gPACIFIC, ORGANIC POLENTA, JALAPENO CHEDDAR, JALAPENO CHEDDARCRACOVIA WHITE BEANS WITH MUSHROOMS & TOMATO SAUCE

Calories90 kcal157 kcal

Protein3 g11.9 g

Fiber2 g8.6 g

Total fat4 g0 g

Saturated fat2.5 g0 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium290 mg92 mg

Potassium0 mg1 mg

Calcium60 mg92 mg

Iron0.36 mg3.89 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.