Side-by-side comparison

PACIFIC, WILD KETA SALMON, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PACIFIC, WILD KETA SALMON, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 1.2g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0.5g vs 0.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

PACIFIC, WILD KETA SALMON, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL

Decent · 2 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gPACIFIC, WILD KETA SALMON, ORIGINAL, ORIGINALBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories158.07 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein28.07 g21.43 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat2.63 g1.53 g

Saturated fat0.88 g0.51 g

Added sugar1.22 g0 g

Sodium1000 mg438.78 mg

Potassium0 mg142.86 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron0 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.