Side-by-side comparison

PERDUE ORIGINAL SPICY CHICKEN BREAST CUTLETS, ORIGINAL SPICY vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PERDUE ORIGINAL SPICY CHICKEN BREAST CUTLETS, ORIGINAL SPICY scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0.5g vs 3.5g per 100 g) and protein (21.4g vs 12.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

PERDUE ORIGINAL SPICY CHICKEN BREAST CUTLETS, ORIGINAL SPICY

Decent · 1 cutlet

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gPERDUE ORIGINAL SPICY CHICKEN BREAST CUTLETS, ORIGINAL SPICYBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories270.59 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein12.94 g21.43 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat16.47 g1.53 g

Saturated fat3.53 g0.51 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium376.47 mg438.78 mg

Potassium0 mg142.86 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron1.27 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.