Side-by-side comparison

RARE FARE FOODS ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY FLAVORED CLUSTERS, ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY vs Marshmallow

Marshmallow wins by 23 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: RARE FARE FOODS ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY FLAVORED CLUSTERS, ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY scores 37/100, Marshmallow scores 60/100. Marshmallow wins by 23 points on added sugar (0g vs 25g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0.1g vs 1.8g per 100 g).

0/ 100

sweet

RARE FARE FOODS ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY FLAVORED CLUSTERS, ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY

Poor · 4 PIECES | ABOUT

0/ 100

sweet

Marshmallow

Good · 100 g

Per 100gRARE FARE FOODS ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRY FLAVORED CLUSTERS, ALMOND QUINOA AND CRANBERRYMarshmallow

Calories500 kcal318 kcal

Protein10.71 g1.8 g

Fiber7.11 g0.1 g

Total fat28.61 g0.2 g

Saturated fat1.79 g0.06 g

Added sugar25 g0 g

Sodium535.71 mg80 mg

Potassium392.86 mg5 mg

Calcium142.86 mg3 mg

Iron2.14 mg0.23 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.