Side-by-side comparison

RICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 79 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

RICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE

Avoid · 1 piece

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gRICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories377.78 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein2.22 g9.8 g

Fiber2.2 g9.8 g

Total fat11.11 g25.49 g

Saturated fat11.11 g4.9 g

Added sugar51.1 g0 g

Sodium56 mg0 mg

Potassium112.89 mg745.1 mg

Calcium24 mg78.04 mg

Iron2.22 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.