Side-by-side comparison

SMORZ CRUNCHY GRAHAM FLAVORED CEREAL WRAPPED IN RICH CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH MARSHMALLOWS, CRUNCHY GRAHAM WITH MARSHMALLOWS vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 60 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SMORZ CRUNCHY GRAHAM FLAVORED CEREAL WRAPPED IN RICH CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH MARSHMALLOWS, CRUNCHY GRAHAM WITH MARSHMALLOWS scores 22/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 60 points on added sugar (0g vs 41.5g per 100 g) and sodium (0mg vs 463mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

SMORZ CRUNCHY GRAHAM FLAVORED CEREAL WRAPPED IN RICH CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH MARSHMALLOWS, CRUNCHY GRAHAM WITH MARSHMALLOWS

Avoid · 1 1/4 cup

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gSMORZ CRUNCHY GRAHAM FLAVORED CEREAL WRAPPED IN RICH CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH MARSHMALLOWS, CRUNCHY GRAHAM WITH MARSHMALLOWSLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories414.63 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein4.88 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat7.32 g25.49 g

Saturated fat1.22 g4.9 g

Added sugar41.5 g0 g

Sodium463.41 mg0 mg

Potassium121.95 mg745.1 mg

Calcium24 mg78.04 mg

Iron11.2 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.