Side-by-side comparison

TABASCO HOT 'N SWEET PICKLES, HOT 'N SWEET vs INCA'S GOLD ORGANIC BLACK CHIA, BLACK

INCA'S GOLD ORGANIC BLACK CHIA, BLACK wins by 85 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: TABASCO HOT 'N SWEET PICKLES, HOT 'N SWEET scores 0/100, INCA'S GOLD ORGANIC BLACK CHIA, BLACK scores 85/100. INCA'S GOLD ORGANIC BLACK CHIA, BLACK wins by 85 points on added sugar (0g vs 20g per 100 g) and sodium (0mg vs 750mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

TABASCO HOT 'N SWEET PICKLES, HOT 'N SWEET

Avoid · 1 ONZ

0/ 100

other

INCA'S GOLD ORGANIC BLACK CHIA, BLACK

Very good · 20 GRM

Per 100gTABASCO HOT 'N SWEET PICKLES, HOT 'N SWEETINCA'S GOLD ORGANIC BLACK CHIA, BLACK

Calories142.86 kcal490 kcal

Protein0 g20 g

Fiber0 g35 g

Total fat0 g32.5 g

Saturated fat0 g2.5 g

Added sugar20.03 g0 g

Sodium750 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg550 mg

Iron0 mg9.9 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.