Side-by-side comparison

TRUROOTS ANCIENT THREE-SEED QOOKIES vs NABISCO BELVITA COOKIES CINNAMON 1X1.760 OZ

NABISCO BELVITA COOKIES CINNAMON 1X1.760 OZ wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: TRUROOTS ANCIENT THREE-SEED QOOKIES scores 32/100, NABISCO BELVITA COOKIES CINNAMON 1X1.760 OZ scores 56/100. NABISCO BELVITA COOKIES CINNAMON 1X1.760 OZ wins by 24 points on saturated fat (1g vs 12.5g per 100 g) and sodium (240mg vs 286mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

sweet

TRUROOTS ANCIENT THREE-SEED QOOKIES

Poor · 2 COOKIES

0/ 100

sweet

NABISCO BELVITA COOKIES CINNAMON 1X1.760 OZ

Decent · 1 pack (50g) (1 biscuit)

Per 100gTRUROOTS ANCIENT THREE-SEED QOOKIESNABISCO BELVITA COOKIES CINNAMON 1X1.760 OZ

Calories500 kcal400 kcal

Protein7.14 g6 g

Fiber3.61 g8 g

Total fat25 g16 g

Saturated fat12.5 g1 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium286.07 mg240 mg

Potassium0 mg210 mg

Calcium142.86 mg19 mg

Iron2.57 mg3.6 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.