Side-by-side comparison

WOLFGANG PUCK, NEW ENGLAND CLAM CHOWDER SOUP vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: WOLFGANG PUCK, NEW ENGLAND CLAM CHOWDER SOUP scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0.5g vs 2g per 100 g) and protein (21.4g vs 1.6g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

WOLFGANG PUCK, NEW ENGLAND CLAM CHOWDER SOUP

Decent · 1 cup

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gWOLFGANG PUCK, NEW ENGLAND CLAM CHOWDER SOUPBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories60.82 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein1.63 g21.43 g

Fiber0.8 g0 g

Total fat2.86 g1.53 g

Saturated fat2.04 g0.51 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium240.82 mg438.78 mg

Potassium0 mg142.86 mg

Calcium16 mg0 mg

Iron0.29 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.