Side-by-side comparison

WOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG TOM BAS BISQ 14.5OZ vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

prepared

WOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG TOM BAS BISQ 14.5OZ

Decent · Per 1 Cup

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gWOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG TOM BAS BISQ 14.5OZBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories62.08 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein0.83 g21.43 g

Fiber1.2 g0 g

Total fat2.5 g1.53 g

Saturated fat1.67 g0.51 g

Added sugar2.5 g0 g

Sodium245.83 mg438.78 mg

Potassium145.83 mg142.86 mg

Calcium38 mg0 mg

Iron0.33 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.