Side-by-side comparison

BROOKSIDE, WHOLE ALMONDS IN SMOOTH DARK CHOCOLATE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 71 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

BROOKSIDE, WHOLE ALMONDS IN SMOOTH DARK CHOCOLATE

Avoid · 1.8 ONZ

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gBROOKSIDE, WHOLE ALMONDS IN SMOOTH DARK CHOCOLATELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories529.41 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein9.8 g9.8 g

Fiber5.9 g9.8 g

Total fat37.25 g25.49 g

Saturated fat15.71 g4.9 g

Added sugar28.83 g0 g

Sodium78.04 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium39.02 mg78.04 mg

Iron5.29 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.