FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

BROOKSIDE DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 69 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BROOKSIDE DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS scores 13/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 69 points on added sugar (0g vs 29g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 17.1g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
BROOKSIDE DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS
Avoid · 10 PIECES
Per 100gBROOKSIDE DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDSLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories512.2 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein9.76 g9.8 g
Fiber7.29 g9.8 g
Total fat36.59 g25.49 g
Saturated fat17.1 g4.9 g
Added sugar29.02 g0 g
Sodium72.93 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium49.02 mg78.04 mg
Iron4.39 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.