Side-by-side comparison

CHESTER'S Chesters Salted 3z vs BABY RUTH BAR

CHESTER'S Chesters Salted 3z wins by 76 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: CHESTER'S Chesters Salted 3z scores 76/100, BABY RUTH BAR scores 0/100. CHESTER'S Chesters Salted 3z wins by 76 points on added sugar (0g vs 37.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (5.4g vs 12.2g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

CHESTER'S Chesters Salted 3z

Very good · None

0/ 100

snack

BABY RUTH BAR

Avoid · 2 BARS

Per 100gCHESTER'S Chesters Salted 3zBABY RUTH BAR

Calories571.43 kcal459.46 kcal

Protein7.14 g5.41 g

Fiber10.71 g2.7 g

Total fat35.71 g21.59 g

Saturated fat5.36 g12.19 g

Added sugar0 g37.83 g

Sodium714.29 mg230 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg54.05 mg

Iron1.29 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.