Side-by-side comparison

CLIF BAR WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY ENERGY BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY vs CAPE COD SELECT, CRANBERRIES PLUS APPLES

CAPE COD SELECT, CRANBERRIES PLUS APPLES wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: CLIF BAR WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY ENERGY BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY scores 37/100, CAPE COD SELECT, CRANBERRIES PLUS APPLES scores 61/100. CAPE COD SELECT, CRANBERRIES PLUS APPLES wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 29.4g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 1.5g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

CLIF BAR WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY ENERGY BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY

Poor · 1 bar

0/ 100

beverage

CAPE COD SELECT, CRANBERRIES PLUS APPLES

Good · 1.33 cup

Per 100gCLIF BAR WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRY ENERGY BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE CRANBERRYCAPE COD SELECT, CRANBERRIES PLUS APPLES

Calories367.65 kcal53.01 kcal

Protein13.21 g0 g

Fiber5.9 g2.3 g

Total fat7.35 g0 g

Saturated fat1.47 g0 g

Added sugar29.4 g0 g

Sodium323.53 mg0 mg

Potassium327.94 mg0 mg

Calcium62.06 mg0 mg

Iron2.94 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.