Side-by-side comparison

CLIF WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA NUT GRANOLA BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA NUT vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 57 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

CLIF WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA NUT GRANOLA BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA NUT

Avoid · 2 BARS

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gCLIF WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA NUT GRANOLA BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA NUTLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories476.19 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein7.14 g9.8 g

Fiber7.1 g9.8 g

Total fat21.4 g25.49 g

Saturated fat3.57 g4.9 g

Added sugar20 g0 g

Sodium250 mg0 mg

Potassium201.9 mg745.1 mg

Calcium48.1 mg78.04 mg

Iron2.57 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.