Side-by-side comparison

Farmland ""HAM,H&W,CKD,FL,4X6,4/13#"" vs IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

IMPOSSIBLE BEEF wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Farmland ""HAM,H&W,CKD,FL,4X6,4/13#"" scores 39/100, IMPOSSIBLE BEEF scores 63/100. IMPOSSIBLE BEEF wins by 24 points on added sugar (0.9g vs 3.8g per 100 g) and sodium (327mg vs 1320mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

Farmland ""HAM,H&W,CKD,FL,4X6,4/13#""

Poor · 56 GR

0/ 100

prepared

IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gFarmland ""HAM,H&W,CKD,FL,4X6,4/13#""IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

Calories107 kcal204.42 kcal

Protein12.5 g16.81 g

Fiber0 g4.4 g

Total fat4 g11.5 g

Saturated fat2 g5.31 g

Added sugar3.78 g0.9 g

Sodium1320 mg327.43 mg

Potassium0 mg618.58 mg

Calcium0 mg159.29 mg

Iron0 mg3.72 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.