Side-by-side comparison

FIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQ vs NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP

NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: FIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQ scores 48/100, NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP scores 72/100. NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 2.7g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 1.4g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

FIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQ

Decent · 13 bites

0/ 100

other

NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gFIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQNEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP

Calories254.55 kcal106.19 kcal

Protein11.82 g20.44 g

Fiber2.7 g0 g

Total fat12.73 g1.77 g

Saturated fat1.36 g0 g

Added sugar2.7 g0 g

Sodium600 mg150.44 mg

Potassium145.45 mg0 mg

Calcium18 mg53.01 mg

Iron3.18 mg2.39 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.