Side-by-side comparison

GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, CORN TORTILLA CHIPS vs BABY RUTH BAR

GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, CORN TORTILLA CHIPS wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, CORN TORTILLA CHIPS scores 82/100, BABY RUTH BAR scores 0/100. GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, CORN TORTILLA CHIPS wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 37.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 12.2g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, CORN TORTILLA CHIPS

Very good · 1 ONZ

0/ 100

snack

BABY RUTH BAR

Avoid · 2 BARS

Per 100gGARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, CORN TORTILLA CHIPSBABY RUTH BAR

Calories428.57 kcal459.46 kcal

Protein7.14 g5.41 g

Fiber7.11 g2.7 g

Total fat16.11 g21.59 g

Saturated fat0 g12.19 g

Added sugar0 g37.83 g

Sodium232.14 mg230 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg54.05 mg

Iron2.57 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.