Side-by-side comparison

GARDEN OF EATIN' RED HOT BLUES CORN TORTILLA CHIPS, RED HOT BLUES vs Austin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz

GARDEN OF EATIN' RED HOT BLUES CORN TORTILLA CHIPS, RED HOT BLUES wins by 57 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: GARDEN OF EATIN' RED HOT BLUES CORN TORTILLA CHIPS, RED HOT BLUES scores 57/100, Austin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz scores 0/100. GARDEN OF EATIN' RED HOT BLUES CORN TORTILLA CHIPS, RED HOT BLUES wins by 57 points on added sugar (0g vs 15.7g per 100 g) and saturated fat (1.8g vs 4.7g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

GARDEN OF EATIN' RED HOT BLUES CORN TORTILLA CHIPS, RED HOT BLUES

Decent · 1 ONZ

0/ 100

snack

Austin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz

Avoid · 1 Package

Per 100gGARDEN OF EATIN' RED HOT BLUES CORN TORTILLA CHIPS, RED HOT BLUESAustin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz

Calories500 kcal484.62 kcal

Protein7.14 g7 g

Fiber7.11 g2.2 g

Total fat25 g22.31 g

Saturated fat1.79 g4.69 g

Added sugar0 g15.7 g

Sodium535.71 mg576.92 mg

Potassium250 mg122.05 mg

Calcium0 mg54.1 mg

Iron5.71 mg3.21 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.