Side-by-side comparison

HORMEL APPLE BOURBON PORK TENDERLOIN, APPLE BOURBON vs SWEET SUE CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS

SWEET SUE CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: HORMEL APPLE BOURBON PORK TENDERLOIN, APPLE BOURBON scores 49/100, SWEET SUE CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS scores 73/100. SWEET SUE CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 2.5g per 100 g) and sodium (268mg vs 473mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

HORMEL APPLE BOURBON PORK TENDERLOIN, APPLE BOURBON

Decent · 4 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

SWEET SUE CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS

Good · 2 ONZ

Per 100gHORMEL APPLE BOURBON PORK TENDERLOIN, APPLE BOURBONSWEET SUE CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS

Calories116.07 kcal161.07 kcal

Protein17.86 g10.7 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat3.57 g12.5 g

Saturated fat1.34 g3.57 g

Added sugar2.5 g0 g

Sodium473.21 mg267.86 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg71.07 mg

Iron0.64 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.