Side-by-side comparison

Hormel Foods Corporation HORMEL, BLOCK LABEL, UNSLICED CANADIAN BACON vs ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON

ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Hormel Foods Corporation HORMEL, BLOCK LABEL, UNSLICED CANADIAN BACON scores 46/100, ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON scores 70/100. ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0.6g vs 1.8g per 100 g) and sodium (294mg vs 839mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

Hormel Foods Corporation HORMEL, BLOCK LABEL, UNSLICED CANADIAN BACON

Decent · 2 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 POUCH

Per 100gHormel Foods Corporation HORMEL, BLOCK LABEL, UNSLICED CANADIAN BACONALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON

Calories125 kcal117.65 kcal

Protein19.64 g22.35 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat4.46 g2.35 g

Saturated fat1.79 g0.59 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium839.29 mg294.12 mg

Potassium0 mg423.53 mg

Calcium0 mg20.94 mg

Iron0.64 mg1.18 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.