Side-by-side comparison

Hormel Foods Corporation RICE & CHICKEN WHITE CHICKEN MEAT AND RICE WITH CARROTS AND PEAS IN A SAVORY SAUCE, RICE & CHICKEN vs ARNOLD SANDWICH THINS

ARNOLD SANDWICH THINS wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Hormel Foods Corporation RICE & CHICKEN WHITE CHICKEN MEAT AND RICE WITH CARROTS AND PEAS IN A SAVORY SAUCE, RICE & CHICKEN scores 39/100, ARNOLD SANDWICH THINS scores 63/100. ARNOLD SANDWICH THINS wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0g vs 0.5g per 100 g) and sodium (395mg vs 418mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

grain

Hormel Foods Corporation RICE & CHICKEN WHITE CHICKEN MEAT AND RICE WITH CARROTS AND PEAS IN A SAVORY SAUCE, RICE & CHICKEN

Poor · 1 TRAY

0/ 100

grain

ARNOLD SANDWICH THINS

Good · 1 ROLL

Per 100gHormel Foods Corporation RICE & CHICKEN WHITE CHICKEN MEAT AND RICE WITH CARROTS AND PEAS IN A SAVORY SAUCE, RICE & CHICKENARNOLD SANDWICH THINS

Calories84.98 kcal232.56 kcal

Protein3.29 g11.6 g

Fiber0.5 g11.6 g

Total fat1.64 g2.33 g

Saturated fat0.47 g0 g

Added sugar0.5 g3.26 g

Sodium417.84 mg395.35 mg

Potassium130.99 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg140 mg

Iron0.33 mg2.51 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.