Side-by-side comparison

KIRKLAND SIGNATURE ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA vs SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

KIRKLAND SIGNATURE ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA wins by 68 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: KIRKLAND SIGNATURE ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA scores 68/100, SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI scores 0/100. KIRKLAND SIGNATURE ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA wins by 68 points on added sugar (0g vs 35g per 100 g) and sodium (321mg vs 1471mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

KIRKLAND SIGNATURE ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA

Good · 2 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Avoid · 2 Tbsp

Per 100gKIRKLAND SIGNATURE ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNASIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Calories143.04 kcal211.05 kcal

Protein28.57 g0 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat2.68 g0 g

Saturated fat0.89 g0 g

Added sugar0 g35 g

Sodium321.43 mg1471.05 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron0.64 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.