Side-by-side comparison

LARABAR RENOLA REINVENTING GRANOLA, COCOA COCONUT vs BACK TO NATURE RICE THIN CRACKERS, SESAME SEED

BACK TO NATURE RICE THIN CRACKERS, SESAME SEED wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: LARABAR RENOLA REINVENTING GRANOLA, COCOA COCONUT scores 39/100, BACK TO NATURE RICE THIN CRACKERS, SESAME SEED scores 63/100. BACK TO NATURE RICE THIN CRACKERS, SESAME SEED wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 10g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 17.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

LARABAR RENOLA REINVENTING GRANOLA, COCOA COCONUT

Poor · 0.25 cup

0/ 100

snack

BACK TO NATURE RICE THIN CRACKERS, SESAME SEED

Good · 15 CRACKERS

Per 100gLARABAR RENOLA REINVENTING GRANOLA, COCOA COCONUTBACK TO NATURE RICE THIN CRACKERS, SESAME SEED

Calories607.14 kcal433.33 kcal

Protein14.29 g6.67 g

Fiber7.11 g3.3 g

Total fat46.43 g6.67 g

Saturated fat17.89 g0 g

Added sugar10 g0 g

Sodium88.93 mg283 mg

Potassium0 mg133 mg

Calcium71.07 mg0 mg

Iron6.43 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.