FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

LIDL DARK CHOCOLATE WITH WHOLE ALMOND, WHOLE ALMOND vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 60 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: LIDL DARK CHOCOLATE WITH WHOLE ALMOND, WHOLE ALMOND scores 22/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 60 points on added sugar (0g vs 26.3g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 15g per 100 g).

Per 100gLIDL DARK CHOCOLATE WITH WHOLE ALMOND, WHOLE ALMONDLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories575 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein7.5 g9.8 g
Fiber10 g9.8 g
Total fat37.5 g25.49 g
Saturated fat15 g4.9 g
Added sugar26.25 g0 g
Sodium0 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium100 mg78.04 mg
Iron3.6 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.