Side-by-side comparison

LIDL ULTRA THIN SLICES BLACK FOREST HAM vs BUMBLE BEE WILD ALASKA RED SALMON

BUMBLE BEE WILD ALASKA RED SALMON wins by 23 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: LIDL ULTRA THIN SLICES BLACK FOREST HAM scores 49/100, BUMBLE BEE WILD ALASKA RED SALMON scores 72/100. BUMBLE BEE WILD ALASKA RED SALMON wins by 23 points on added sugar (0g vs 1.3g per 100 g) and sodium (349mg vs 764mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

LIDL ULTRA THIN SLICES BLACK FOREST HAM

Decent · 5 SLICES

0/ 100

prepared

BUMBLE BEE WILD ALASKA RED SALMON

Good · 2.2 ONZ

Per 100gLIDL ULTRA THIN SLICES BLACK FOREST HAMBUMBLE BEE WILD ALASKA RED SALMON

Calories109.09 kcal158.73 kcal

Protein18.18 g20.63 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat1.82 g7.94 g

Saturated fat0 g1.59 g

Added sugar1.27 g0 g

Sodium763.64 mg349.21 mg

Potassium0 mg349.21 mg

Calcium0 mg396.83 mg

Iron0.65 mg0.57 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.