Side-by-side comparison

LINDT WILLIAMS, LIQUOR CHOCOLATE WITH WILLIAMS PEAR vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: LINDT WILLIAMS, LIQUOR CHOCOLATE WITH WILLIAMS PEAR scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 39.9g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 14g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

LINDT WILLIAMS, LIQUOR CHOCOLATE WITH WILLIAMS PEAR

Avoid · 1 BAR

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gLINDT WILLIAMS, LIQUOR CHOCOLATE WITH WILLIAMS PEARLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories467 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein4.5 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat23 g25.49 g

Saturated fat14 g4.9 g

Added sugar39.9 g0 g

Sodium120 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium0 mg78.04 mg

Iron0 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.