Side-by-side comparison

M&M CHOCOLATE CANDIES vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 76 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: M&M CHOCOLATE CANDIES scores 6/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 76 points on added sugar (0g vs 36.7g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 10.7g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

M&M CHOCOLATE CANDIES

Avoid · 1.5 ONZ

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gM&M CHOCOLATE CANDIESLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories523.81 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein9.52 g9.8 g

Fiber2.4 g9.8 g

Total fat26.19 g25.49 g

Saturated fat10.69 g4.9 g

Added sugar36.67 g0 g

Sodium48.1 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium95 mg78.04 mg

Iron0.86 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.