Side-by-side comparison

NABISCO, OREO, CHOCOLATE COVERED BAR vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 65 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

NABISCO, OREO, CHOCOLATE COVERED BAR

Avoid · 0.88 ONZ

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gNABISCO, OREO, CHOCOLATE COVERED BARLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories576 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein6 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat36 g25.49 g

Saturated fat0 g4.9 g

Added sugar39.2 g0 g

Sodium288.4 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium0 mg78.04 mg

Iron0 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.