Side-by-side comparison

NABISCO OREO COOKIES WHITE FUDGE CHOCOLATE COVERED OREO1X8.5 OZ vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

NABISCO OREO COOKIES WHITE FUDGE CHOCOLATE COVERED OREO1X8.5 OZ

Avoid · 1 cookie (20g)

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gNABISCO OREO COOKIES WHITE FUDGE CHOCOLATE COVERED OREO1X8.5 OZLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories500 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein5 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat25 g25.49 g

Saturated fat17.5 g4.9 g

Added sugar35 g0 g

Sodium325 mg0 mg

Potassium150 mg745.1 mg

Calcium52 mg78.04 mg

Iron2.7 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.